Here we go again!

There should have been a new Quinquennium of the General Synod beginning this week. We should have been gathering in the Abbey cloisters, being marshaled into our diocesan groups like competitors parading at the beginning of the Olympic Games. There would have been a splendid Eucharist in the Abbey and then Her Majesty would have joined us in the Synod Chamber to address us at the beginning of our work (it’s a bit like the Opening of Parliament with less ermine). We would have been sat there in our Sunday best, the clergy in convocation dress, the laity, in the main, dressed up, with a smattering of hats (how we miss Christina Baxter’s array of millinery).

Not quite like our opening procession!

Instead the elections to Synod were delayed, we have all been kept on for another year as this pandemic disrupts every aspect of life, and we are meeting online rather than in person.

So today begins a Group of Sessions the agenda of which is made up of items of business that have to be dealt with – the budget, IICSA, cathedrals, LLF – to name but a few.

So I will do my best to keep you up todate with what goes on. Join us online if you can, if not pray for us plaese.

Almighty God, you have given your Holy Spirit to the Church to lead us into all truth: bless with the Spirit’s grace and presence the members of the General Synod; keep them steadfast in faith and united in love, that they may manifest your glory and prepare the way of your kingdom; through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

All done and dusted

This special Session of General Synod is all over. The deed is done and the legislation that was before us for consideration has passed through all its stages. It is really amazing what can be achieved when people focus on the task. But this meeting proved to be much more powerful than appeared when you were simply looking at the agenda.

All done and dusted

We began with Presidential Addresses. The Archbishop of York began and then was followed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Both spoke so powerfully and with honesty. Apologies were made for what had not gone well, there was a commitment to do better. What has gone well was celebrated and the reality was addressed. We will emerge a different church serving a different nation. Nothing will be quite the same. It was that sense of realism, held in the context of belief in the God who is always faithful, that set the tone for all that followed.

There were four stages to the legislative process that would see the elegantly named ‘General Synod (Remote Meetings) (Temporary Standing Orders) Measure achieve final approval and be passed on to Parliament. There was a general debate, then the Revision Stage with all the amendments. Then in the light of that a debate on the hastily written Report from the Steering Committee (written over lunch) and then the Final Approval debate.

So what did we talk about? Well a great many people talked about those who were not in the room. That is often seen as impolite but there was real consciousness of those who had given up their right to be at this meeting of Synod. I was conscious that I was the only Dean present, my fellow Deans had stood aside to allow me to attend so that I was also available to chair. There was an underlying generosity apparent and a graciousness.

Then there was a recognition that passing this Measure did not mean that we did not acknowledge that there is such a thing as digital poverty and inequality in this country. Some members may not own the equipment that they will need, some won’t have superfast broadband (we don’t even have it where I live alongside the Thames in central London!), others are not tech savvy or tech happy. Yet there was also a recognition that meeting electronically will provide better access for those who normally have to leave family to come, or take excessive amounts of unpaid leave in order to be at the Synod.

There was debate in the Revision Stage on two particular issues. The first was around whether or not Article 7 business should be included in the purview of the Measure. Article 7 deals with matters of doctrine, the Canons, our liturgy, those kinds of things. The Measure excluded such business from being able to be considered remotely. There were a lot of people who wanted to amend this to include it. There was suspicion around on all sides that either people were wanting to pull a fast one hoping to get some changes through – such as around the Canons governing the Administration of the Sacrament of Holy Communion – or that if matters of doctrine were dealt with in this way they wouldn’t get the thorough consideration they demand. In the end the amendment was not supported.

The second area of debate was around a ‘sunset clause’. It says in the title that this is ‘Temporary’ but there is no ‘sell by date’ in the Measure itself. So weren’t we in danger of creating something temporary that might become permanent (a bit like the tower space platform in Southwark Cathedral)? Again, it was well debated and then Synod decided to stay with the Measure as it was and reject the amendment, trusting Synodical processes rather than writing everything into the Measure.

The final vote was unanimous in all three Houses (just two abstentions in the House of Laity) and that was a resounding endorsement for what will be a new way of working and decision making.

But one of the final speakers made a sobering point that I hadn’t thought about. We are due to have delayed elections to General Synod next year. We are unlikely to meet in person in February and, if we are being honest and realistic, not in July either. For those of us who might not be reelected next time and those who might not stand again, this may have been the last time we sat in the Synod Chamber. It is a beautiful space and if I don’t get the chance to sit there again I will miss it. And I will particularly miss the text around the dome., I sang it as a young chorister and I read it every time I am there.

Holy is the True Light, and passing wonderful, lending radiance to them that endured in the heat of the conflict, from Christ they inherit a home of unfading splendour, wherein they rejoice with gladness evermore. Alleluia!

There is no other prayer to offer.

The few

‘Are we quorate?’ That is often the cry you hear at meetings, especially if someone is wanting to disrupt the meeting. Heads are counted, Constitutions checked. ‘Yes, we’re fine.’ The meeting resumes.

It won’t look like this!

Today General Synod meets in the Chamber for one day only. Just a few people will be present, enough to make it quorate. A great deal of work has gone it to make it all Covid secure – all the usual masks and sanitiser – but also being allocated seats in the chamber. Normally we look out for our friends or at least someone we don’t mind spending time alongside as we walk through one of the doors and decide where to sit. This time we will have to discover who our distanced and allotted neighbour is – for Christians that is like being allocated a pew in church – scary!

So, what is the purpose of meeting under such circumstances in such a strange way? We are there to do one thing and one thing only; to pass a piece of legislation, the excitingly named ‘General Synod (Remote Meetings) (Temporary Standing Orders) Measure’. If it gets through all its stages today it will enable the Synod to meet remotely and to make legally binding decisions, remotely. When we had our Zoom Synod in July we could only talk and not decide. If we do our work today we will be able to meet, talk and decide remotely.

As ever we need your prayers. We only ever meet seeking the wisdom and guidance of the Holy Spirit and whether the agenda is long or as short as this, the need is the same.

Holy Spirit, guide us and keep us as we seek to do the Father’s will, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.

Unprecedented

You sometimes find people who use your name at every verse end and you end up thinking – well, I do – ‘please stop it, you’ll wear it out’!  But maybe they’ve been on a training course and this was a top tip for how to deal with people effectively.

In Alan Bennett’s ‘Talking Heads’ monologue ‘Her big chance’, Lesley, an actor, has read a book on interviews hoping to get another acting part.  She meet’s a potential director.

‘Said his name was Simon, which I instantly committed to memory. (That’s one of the points in the book: purpose and use of name.)

Anyway, it’s not a name but a word that is in danger of being worn out, ‘unprecedented’.  It has been the word of the pandemic and was the word being bandied about at yesterday’s ‘unprecedented’ meeting of the members of the General Synod.  It was unprecedented because we had never met like this before, never had to, never met in such an informal way, never had so many questions, and so on and so on.

But these times are unprecedented and it was was really important that this meeting of the Synod was held.  The fact that by the end of a long day staring at a screen there were still almost 300 people participating says it all.  Apart from worship which, quite rightly. book-ended the day, we had three things – a Presidential Address which was shared between the new Archbishop of York and the Archbishop of Canterbury; a presentation on the churches response to Covid-19 and Questions, which is what I was responsible for looking after.  In many ways the whole day was about Covid – our response to it and where we go from here.  There’s clearly a great deal of thinking going on and I am delighted that Archbishop Stephen will be leading some of that thinking.

Synod can act as a valve on a pressure cooker.  It gives people the opportunity to let off steam.  I think that was what was going on yesterday.  There has been a great deal of frustration and anger about, not least among the clergy, about the way in which our churches became inaccessible places just when we needed them the most – we being the nation they were built for, to the glory of God.  There was anger about all the guidance which looked like instruction rather than advice, there was anger about an apparent flouting of Canon Law and what could appear easily as a deliberate sidelining of legal opinion and advice.  

187974-moses-breaks-the-stone-tablets-on_lg

There are plenty of unprecedented Rubicons which may have been crossed during these last three months – a huge shift in our understanding of worship and how to conduct it, and how online can be more accessible for some than physical place is.  But I fear that a Rubicon has been crossed in relation to how we, how I, sit in relation to Canon Law.  We spend hours in General Synod looking at Canons and Amending Canons, as though they were something that came down on stone tablets from the mountain.  But has this episode in our life been like that described in the Book of Exodus

Moses’ anger burned hot, and he threw the tablets from his hands and broke them at the foot of the mountain. (Exodus 32.19)

It was a dramatic moment – and fortunately God had a second copy – but law is fragile; it can be shattered.  Appealing to the unprecedented nature of the times in relation to ignoring Canon Law, which is how it can appear some of the leadership is justifying their actions, surely gives space for others to do the same in other unprecedented, unanticipated, unprepared for situations that they face in their parishes, communities, in their ministries.  And those of us who are ordained and those who share in leadership and governance in our communities know that there is a lot that is unprecedented, that falls into these categories where we need to be responsive rather than strategic.

So it was good to let the steam out and have that opportunity to hold various levels of leadership to account – and that, after all, is one of the functions of General Synod.  I have seen enough ‘blue hands’ on a screen for a long long time.  Apologies to those whose blue hands I missed – it is even more difficult at times than spotting raised hands in a chamber – and I missed Mr Freeman’s call for a vote on closing this item of business.  But we will get back to that I am sure.

One thing that was announced at the beginning of the meeting was that there will be a physical meeting of the General Synod in Westminster on 24 September to debate and approve a Measure which would allow us to meet virtually in November (if that is still required by the pandemic) to do some vital pieces of work which at the moment the ‘law’ relating to Synod would not permit.  We cannot pass anything virtually.  In November we need to do some of the things we would have been doing this weekend in York – the budget, setting Fees, that kind of thing.  So we have more ‘unprecedented’ events for the Synod on the horizon!

But the God who knows us by name and calls us by name and never wears it out, is the God of every time, unprecedented or not, the God who sees us through with the law of love, a law which not even the cross could break.

God of time, God of love,
see us through this present time,
to whatever the future may hold.
Amen.

In the waiting room

We are in that moment of waiting. Zoom has gone live and you can follow it all on YouTube if you are not a member of the General Synod. So far, so good.

God of all our waiting, send your spirit upon us and guide us in the paths you would wish us to tread. Amen.

Zooming into Synod

We should have been in York.  We should have been wandering round the campus of York University.  We should have been sat on the steps outside the main hall, drinking tea, looking at geese and hoping that this year we would be the person featured in the annual Church Times photo that always appears to set the scene.  We should have been queuing for lunch, queuing for dinner, queuing for the bar.  But we are not, for very obvious reasons.

There is no Group of Sessions this July.  Instead we are invited to Zoom into a meeting of the Synod – not a formal meeting, just a meeting.  It is just one day, the first time this has ever been done, ground-breaking and showing that even the governance of the Church of England can flex, even a little bit.

As a member of the Panel of Chairs I will be in Church House, in one of the meeting rooms, ready to look after two sets of Questions.  Yesterday we had a rehearsal, tomorrow we do it for real.

Zoom screen

A screen from our Zoom Iftar

We have all become exhaustingly familiar with the Zoom screen in front of us.  When lock down began I hadn’t heard of Zoom, now I am too familiar with it.  But we have used it for more than meetings.  It was the way in which we read the Passion together on Good Friday, it was the way we said prayers as a group for our keeping of the VE Day celebrations, it was the way in which we held our Iftar during Ramadan.  We have been using it every Sunday at Southwark Cathedral for a ‘chat to the preacher’.  It has been a blessing even if at other times it has felt like a bit of a curse.

Of course, one of the things that is really great is that I will have so much more power as the Chair on this occasion than is normally the case.  We have at our disposal – apart from the force and charm of our personalities – a series of coloured lights and a bell.  When we have said how long speeches can last, and we have the authority under Standing Order whatever to vary this, then the bewigged lawyer on our left hand watches their stopwatch and moves through the lights, green, amber (one minute remaining) and red.  That is meant to be the sign to the speaker to STOP.  But it doesn’t always have that effect.  So we have this bell, one of those old brass ones you press down on, like summoning a waiter in an old fashioned establishment, and we ring that to assert our authority and get the over excited speaker to stop.

But Zoom of course allows us to simply mute them.  Such power!!

So what are we doing tomorrow?  There will be worship at the beginning and end of the day; a Presidential Address from the Archbishop of Canterbury; two hours of questions; and a presentation and questions on Covid-19.  Questions are therefore going to be the meat of this gathering.  131 questions have been submitted by members and 79 of these are directed to the House of Bishops.  I will do my best to get us through them.

But what we ask of you to do is pray, not just for the Synod but also for all our churches as we emerge from this lock down.  One of the symbols of the resurrection is the butterfly and on one of the lovely Comper reredoses in Southwark Cathedral you can see a flutter of them (the collective noun for butterflies).The caterpillar is locked down in the chrysalis and then the butterfly emerges.

butterfly-flutter

I am reminded of what Paul writes to the Christians in Corinth.

It is sown in dishonour, it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness, it is raised in power. It is sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a physical body, there is also a spiritual body. (1 Corinthians 15.43-44)

This is my prayer for the church, that we emerge glorious, as the resurrection church and people should be.

Holy God,
as we open our doors
and welcome in those who will come
may we recognise you among them.
As we make our churches safe to enter
and care for those who come
may we recognise you as our strong defence.
As we say our prayers
and light our candles
may we recognise you in the midst.
As we resume our life
and live our life
may we recognise you as our life
today, tomorrow and always.
Amen.

Addendum

In my last blog on this site I was talking about the ‘last chapter’ and had mentioned, as a way of getting into my theme, that the book group of which I am a member was reading ‘Little Women’.  I also admitted that I wouldn’t be able to finish the book in time for the meeting today.  In the list of sins that it is possible for a person to commit not finishing a book group book is pretty high up there with other cardinal sins!

a-beautiful-illustrated-facsimile-of-little-women-just-in-time-for-greta-gerwig-s-december-film-adaptation-8

How sweet!

So I was amazed when I discovered this morning that I HAD read the book and that what is called Part II in my Penguin edition is what we know in the UK as ‘Good Wives’! So all that business about Jo making a complete mess of the kitchen whilst attempting to make jelly (jam) is actually in the second book.  Phew!  Relief!  Actually we had a great meeting and decided that all in all it had been a good read.  So I think I will complete ‘Good Wives’ and then leave the March girls to their own devices!

Thanks be to God!

 

The last chapter

The Book Group that I’m a member of meets this Saturday.  We’re reading ‘Little Women’ as a result of the release of the film that so many people are talking about.  Unlike most people in the group I have never read it.  When I was of the age when I could have read it I thought it was a ‘girls’ book’ and despite my rather, let’s say, gentle tastes, that would have been a step too far (it would have been the late sixties!).  But I fear I won’t get to the end of the book. I have just embarked on Part II, the wedding has just happened but I fear that even if I don’t go to bed between now and the meeting I won’t get to the last chapter!

56706-houghton_library-harvard_university-public_domain-wikimedia_commons

Will I get to the end of the book?

It has been only three days, spread over four, that General Synod has met for this February Group of Sessions, but goodness, it has felt a lot longer than that.  I can hardly remember Monday in the aftermath of Storm Ciara.  But today we reached the last chapter, as it were, certainly the last Order Paper – and what an Order Paper!  I have mentioned already the plethora of amendments that have come from members of Synod to some of the debates.  There has been hardly a single debate where something hasn’t been amended.  But this morning’s Order Paper, which sets out the order of business, the Motions and the amendments, rather than being the four sides of A5 which it would normally be, ran to 16 pages!

But we began the day well with the third and final stage of the Channel Islands Measure.  It was good to get this necessary change approved.  Not only was it a legislative process but it felt like a process of reconciliation.  What could have been fractious, accusatory and difficult was instead marked by a graciousness of spirit.  I don’t mean it lightly when I say that it was a privilege to act as chair for each of the stages and to help Synod do its work.

But then Synod embarked on three pieces of internal business – the House of Laity Election Rules 2020, the Clergy Election Rules 2020 and Convocations (Elections to Upper House) Rules 2020.  Three debates with acres of amendments.  There must be a better way than this for Synod to do this kind of business.  Moses’ father-in-law, Jethro, was a very wise man and when he saw what Moses was up to said to him

‘What you are doing is not good. You will surely wear yourself out, both you and these people with you.’ (Exodus 18.14)

The context was Moses sitting alone in judgement as the people brought their disputes to him.  But the principle of delegation that Jethro recommends, the first instance in scripture (apart from God delegating stewardship of creation to Adam), is a powerful reminder in all governance, judicial and legislative settings that there has to be a better way.

The problem was that Synod was to end with two more important debates, one from the Diocese of Leeds on poverty and the church’s mission to the poorest sectors of our society and then a Private Member’s Motion on Legal Aid Reform.  Both were good debates – but we needed more time, the time eaten up by debates whose ‘chariot wheels’ had been clogged by amendments.  This Synod though has had a theme of justice, when we have not been looking internally.  We have looked at justice for LGBT people, justice for people of colour, justice for the victims and survivors of abuse, justice for the environment, justice for those in funeral poverty, justice for the marginalised in our communities, justice for those denied justice.  One member of Synod in one of the debates said that we were wrong to be spending time on such issues because one thing only mattered and that was that people believe the Gospel of Our Lord Jesus Christ otherwise they will burn in hell.  When he said that I realised that we believe in a different God and follow a different Jesus.  The God I worship gave to his prophet Micah these words and this command

‘to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly’ (Micah 6.8)

The Jesus I know, the Jesus I follow is the one who stood before the scroll of the Book of the Prophet Isaiah in the synagogue in which he had worshiped for so many years with his family and read out to them

‘The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
   because he has anointed me
     to bring good news to the poor.
He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives
   and recovery of sight to the blind,
     to let the oppressed go free,
to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favour.’
(Luke 4.18-19)

Good news is about the God of justice,  good news is about Jesus, good news is about the one who ’emptied himself’ (Philippians 2.7) embracing and inhabiting the poverty of human nature to bring us the riches of his grace.  This means that the church he loved into being, loves into life each and every day, seeks the justice which is characteristic of the kingdom – justice for the marginalised, excluded, ignored, persecuted, forgotten whoever, wherever they are.

This chapter closed with farewells, including, in his absence, a moving farewell to the Archbishop of York, Archbishop Sentamu.  In so many ways he has stood for this justice – not always as well as he might for all groups – but certainly, powerfully, for some.  I was grateful to him for his visible witness on behalf of the people of Zimbabwe.  Not wearing a dog collar, cutting it up in public, and vowing not to wear one again until President Mugabe was out of office was a gimmick but in the end a powerful witness.  Sadly, things are now worse for our sisters and brothers in that wonderful country than they were before, but I thank God for ++Sentamu’s witness and for the countless wonderful and loving brotherly hugs he has given to me over the years.  The chapter is closed but there is yet more to be written as this particular Synod gathers in July for its final time in York. God bless us ’til we meet again.

Glory to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Spirit; as it was in the beginning is now and shall be for ever.  Amen. 

Reality

In one of his ‘Four Quartets’ the poet T S Eliot says

“Humankind cannot bear very much reality.”

I had the feeling today that we were being asked to cope with a great deal of reality in the General Synod.  I’m not complaining.  The priestly task is precisely that, engaging in the reality of the world and bringing it to the altar.  That is what is at the heart of the incarnation.  God enters into the depths of our reality and engages with it.  Jesus is the most real person, as the writer of the Letter to the Hebrews is constantly wanting to make clear

Since, therefore, the children share flesh and blood, he himself likewise shared the same things. (Hebrews 2.14)

reality-1

The ‘flesh and blood’ that Synod was asked to engage with today was real and painful.  We began with the response of the Church of England to the first report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). I, like so many millions of people, watched with horror the two documentaries that the BBC recently showed into the Peter Ball abuse scandal.  I watched as the stories of victims and survivors were told.  I wept, as I am sure you did, at the inadequacy, no, it was more than inadequacy, the complicit inability of the church and its leadership to engage with reality when it was presented to it.  One speaker in the debate today commented that they were surprised by the reaction of people to the documentaries, as though they didn’t know what had been going on.  It was all in the reports we were told, and that is true.  But the way in which the story, the reality was presented to us, that was new and that was so powerful.

The debate on the response of the church to the IICSA report was powerful, painful, honest.  But it left me feeling … well, I don’t know to be honest, numb, guilty, angry, sorry, all those things and more.  But what is any of that compared with those whose lives have been damaged, permanently scarred by what they have suffered at the hands of those in the church they trusted?

That debate was followed by one on the Climate Emergency and Carbon Reduction Target.  Again, it was a deeply powerful debate and there was an almost palpable sense of powerlessness in the chamber.  The issues are so huge, what can we possibly do?  I had proposed an amendment, to name cathedrals specifically in the Motion so that we work alongside the rest of the church and are challenged alongside the rest of the church in achieving the zero emissions target.  Another amendment, which was also accepted, but not one proposed by me, changed this target from 2045 to 2030.  I didn’t support that – I think we are being unrealistic.  But the decision was made and that is what we have committed ourselves too – and, in a way, good for us for being so bold. Climate change is a present reality for so many of our sisters and brothers and we must never forget that.

But the final bit of ‘very much reality’ came in the afternoon, in the debate on Paupers’ Funerals.  The very phrase sends a shiver down the spine but, as we heard there has been a 70% rise in the number of these funerals over the last three years.  You would have thought such things were Dickensian, the experience of young Oliver Twist when he is working with the undertaker Mr Sowerberry. But this is now our reality, when people go into debt to afford a funeral for their loved one, when some councils will not allow family or religion at a ‘Public Health Funeral’, when families do not get to know when the funeral is taking place and will not get the cremated remains of their loved one back, simply because they are poor and I suppose, in Dickensian terms, are ‘undeserving’ of common human dignity and respect.

It was a painful and disturbing debate.  But my mind went to the texts of the Requiem Mass where so many find their comfort in the face of death.  At the very end of the Mass, before the coffin is carried from the church, the choir sings the ‘In paradisum’

In paradisum deducant te Angeli; in tuo adventu suscipiant te martyres, et perducant te in civitatem sanctam Jerusalem. Chorus angelorum te suscipiat, et cum Lazaro quondam paupere æternam habeas requiem.

May the angels lead you into paradise; may the martyrs receive you at your arrival and lead you to the holy city Jerusalem. May choirs of angels receive you and with Lazarus, once a poor man, may you have eternal rest.

9200122_BibliographicResource_1000056114472-660x350

Dives and Lazarus and their changed realities

At the gate of the rich man’s house lies the pauper Lazarus.  Luke tells the tale in Luke 16:19-31.  The rich man and the pauper, the poor man, Lazarus, both die.  But the poor man’s reward is rich in heaven.  Whoever is before us at the Requiem we sing of the pauper, and that is how it should be.  The harsh reality in the parable is this, as Abraham, our father, speaks,

“Child, remember that during your lifetime you received your good things, and Lazarus in like manner evil things; but now he is comforted here, and you are in agony.” (Luke 16.25)

Is this more reality than you can bear, the abuse of the innocent, the rape of the planet, the plight of the dead, the sorrow of the living?  But it is for this reality, into this reality that Jesus came, that Jesus comes, and this reality with which the church must engage.

Incarnate Lord,
you share my flesh,
you share my pain,
may I share your joy,
in your kingdom reality.
Amen.

Quotable quotes

I’ve seen many things in General Synod but I have never seen the number of amendments to some pieces of legislation that we have seen so far in this Group of Sessions. I thought I was going to get Repetitive Strain Injury yesterday afternoon as we were voting on around 16 amendments in one debate! It was all done as efficiently as possible but Synod procedures aren’t exactly designed to be nifty! But what it does show is that some members read the documents we get sent very carefully – and thank goodness for that, however much ones heart sinks at the length of the Order Paper!

But after a lot of rather tedious legislative business (I’m obviously not referring to the Cathedrals Measure), Synod engaged with something that was of real importance.

Fr Andrew Moughtin-Mumby, a priest in Southwark Diocese, had proposed a Private Members Motion back in 2018 when it was the 70th anniversary of the arrival of the Empire Windrush. Those less than nifty processes of Synod, to which I have just referred, meant that we finally debated it yesterday. But in fact it could not have come at a more relevant or opportune time. The news was all about the deportation of a group of people from the UK to Jamaica. The courts were involved, the injustices were clear and it was a reminder that the Windrush scandal was being repeated.

Andrew gave one of the best speeches that I have heard in Synod. From his own experience as a person of colour and as Parish Priest in a black-majority church not far from the cathedral, serving a congregation which has within it people with their own stories of discrimination to tell, he spoke powerfully and carefully and in a very measured but clear way of the need for change.

There were three amendments to his Motion – on the need to offer an apology for our own treatment of the BAME community and on the need to appoint an independent person to look again at how we handle race and ethnicity within the life of the church. The Motion was amended and then carried.

The Archbishop of Canterbury was one of the first to speak in the debate. He threw away his prepared speech and spoke from the heart. It was powerful and moving stuff.

In both his homily at the Eucharist which began the day and in this unprepared speech ++Justin gave us some quotable quotes. In the homily he said this

‘In our haste to make statements we lose sight of the human being.’

In his intervention in the Windrush debate he said

‘We did not do justice in the past, we do not do justice now.’

These are powerful statements, a little like at the Synod in 2017 after the House of Bishops’ paper on sexuality was rejected by the members of Synod, who chose not to take note of it, when ++Justin said that we needed a ‘radical Christian inclusion’. That has proved to be a quotable quote. I know the Archbishop doesn’t say things lightly. But I also know that the church and its leaders can be quick to speak, clever at finding the words and slow or unable or unwilling to act. I will add these new quotable quotes to the list I am collecting as I want to see them being ‘cashed out’ in the life of the church.

In his Sermon on the Mount, Jesus advises the people

Let your word be “Yes, Yes” or “No, No”.’ (Matthew 5.37)

Jesus was good at quotable quotes – the best – but his words always had substance for he was the Word he spoke. May we not lose sight of the human being and live the justice of which we speak, otherwise we should have stopped at yes, or no!

Jesus, may we have the courage to be who we say we are, to live as we promise to live, to be as you would have us be. Amen.

Holy Land

A pilgrimage for returning pilgrims

My Lent Diary

A journey from ashes to a garden

In the Steps of Martin Luther

A Southwark Cathedral Pilgrimage 2017

sabbaticalthoughtsblog.wordpress.com/

Canda, Jerusalem, Mucknall

Southwark Diocesan Pilgrimage 2016

Hearts on Fire - Pilgrims in the Holy Land

A good city for all

A good city for all

In the Steps of St Paul

Southwark Cathedral Pilgrimage June 2015

LIVING GOD

Reflections from the Dean of Southwark

Andrew Nunn's reflections from General Synod

the personal views of the Dean of Southwark